Oral mucosal pigmentation in children attributable to environmental Tobacco smoke

Abstract

Background: Passive smoking among children remains a serious public health concern, particularly because children’s ability to avoid household environmental tobacco smoke exposure is limited when parents smoke. In recent years, increasing scholarly attention has been given to oral mucosal pigmentation as a potential clinical sign of long-term passive smoking in children. However, no previous study has synthesized the available evidence on this topic. Aim: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the association between passive smoking and oral pigmentation in children. Materials and Methods: A systematic search was conducted in international electronic databases, including PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library, in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Observational studies assessing the association between passive smoking and oral pigmentation among children aged ≤18 years were included. Methodological quality was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT). A random-effects meta-analysis was performed, and pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Between-study heterogeneity was assessed using the I² statistic, and the certainty of evidence was evaluated using the GRADE approach. Results: Seven studies involving a total of 1,582 participants met the inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis demonstrated that passive smoking was significantly associated with an increased risk of oral pigmentation in children, with a pooled OR of 2.58 (95% CI, 1.35-4.95; p=0.004). Compared with children without exposure to passive smoking, those exposed to environmental tobacco smoke had an absolute risk increase of 17% (95% CI, 6.3%-23.9%). Subgroup analysis by assessment method showed a consistent effect among studies using the Gingival Pigmentation Index (GPI) (OR, 2.12; 95% CI, 1.58-2.84), whereas studies using the Dummett Oral Pigmentation Index (DOPI) showed a wider confidence interval (OR, 3.26; 95% CI, 0.68-15.54). According to the MMAT assessment, the included studies demonstrated adequate participant selection in 100% of cases, appropriate outcome measurement in 76.9%, and adequate control of confounding factors in 46.2%. Owing to the observational nature of the included studies, moderate heterogeneity, and the potential risk of confounding by physiological pigmentation, the certainty of evidence was rated as low according to GRADE. Conclusion: Children exposed to environmental tobacco smoke had a significantly higher likelihood of oral mucosal pigmentation than unexposed children. These findings suggest that screening for oral mucosal pigmentation during pediatric oral examinations may serve as a non-invasive marker of passive smoking exposure and may provide visible clinical evidence to support counseling parents on smoking cessation and smoke-free household environments.